Some questions I posted on another forum regarding some questions I had on the Reckless system posted below. Bottom line the GL and Altirider bags seem to hold a larger volume on the sidepods than the Reckless 40 L. Also the Reckless 40l bag tops looked like they interfered with the top of the seat, clouding the seat just as my Kriega bags did.
At least the Reckless have proper PVC dry bags and not coatings for waterproofing like the sub standard Kriega bags that failed miserably.
---------------------------------
I posted the below on the ADV Mosko forum thread .
Originally i was wanting the Reckless 40 as I pack pretty minimalist. One of my primary objectives is to keep stuff off the top of the seat for bike handling and ease of mounting (I'm 5'6') the bike. Watching the video of the Reckless 40 I noticed the side bags were a lot smaller than my old kriega Overlander 30 set-up.
I was hoping to pack everything just in the sidepods of the Reckless 40 however the above Overlander 30's are 15L per side and could not fit my hammock/tarp/quilts and I had to resort to a bivy sack and quilt w/no air pad. Also no cooking gear was packed just dried meat/fruits to further minimize packed space. I found 30 liters were the bare minimum for me with camping gear/food/clothes/spares/tools etc.
In your Reckless 40 video I was not sure where your lashing point on the bottom of the bag was positioned. It looked like it was the spot closest to the lower right corner on the right side bag( allowing the bag to sit at it's most vertical position) is this correct?
In the video the Reckless 40 looked like it was positioned quite far from vertical when on your 450. Is it possible to get the bags mounted more vertical to free up butt/leg space?
I'm currently utilizing Altriders Hemisphere bag and while not perfect it seems to carry the bags a bit more horizontal and Ideally would like the 40's to be in a similar position. Is this possible?
I'm thinking if it could be positioned more horizontal I could attach the Molle bags to the fronts of the bags adding needed volume for my needs. In the video it looked quite cramped behind the hamstrings to fit the Molle pouches on the bag if you're my size.
In the Reckless 80 vid the bags were mounted a lot more vertically. The bags would be larger than I would like but I liked the bag position and the fact I could carry my complete load in the 80's side bags and hopefully just tighten down the bags with the compression straps. Would this work securely for aggressive/technical off road riding?
Sideoff any chance of getting an opinon/pics of the 80L Reckless on your 450? Would the wider bags fit securely on the 450 or does the added width of the bags over the seat make it impossible? Could you compress Reckless 80 bags down enough/securely if you're carrying only say 20 liters in the side bags? The capacity of the side bags on the 40 Reckless was stated as 15L, whats the stated capacity on the sidebags of the Reckless 80?